Butch Wonders
  • Blog
  • Butch Store: Genderqueer Us
  • About
  • Contact

Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling

6/4/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture
Friends, I've felt ill about the Masterpiece Cakeshop ruling all day.  (For an explanation of the case, see my last post.)  As you probably know by now, the Supreme Court ruled against Charlie and David, the gay couple who were refused a wedding cake because of their sexual orientation.

The big issue in the case was whether baking a cake was "speech"--that is, whether Colorado's requirement that the baker treat gay and straight people the same was making him "speak" in favor of gay marriage.  If baking a cake was speech (like painting a mural probably would be), it would violate the baker's First Amendment right to free speech.  If, on the other hand, it was more like providing a service (like selling someone a couch probably would be), it would probably not violate the baker's First Amendment right to free speech.  In oral argument, this was the issue the Court spent most of its time on.

However, the Court did not rule on this issue.  Instead, they said that the baker's freedom of religion (a different part of the First Amendment) had been violated by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which decided the case before the case even hit the courthouse.  They essentially said that the Commission had been "hostile" to religion.  The part that seemed to incense them the most was:

I would also like to reiterate what we said in the hearing or the last meeting. Freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the holocaust, whether it be—I mean, we—we can list hundreds of situations where freedom of religion has been used to justify discrimination.  And to me it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to—to use their religion to hurt others.

Personally, I disagree that this is hostile to religion.  I think it's a statement of fact: religion has been used to justify all these things.  It seems to me that the commissioner was just trying to say, "Hey, freedom of religion isn't dispositive--you don't get to do anything you want by claiming it's against your religion."  But--as I understand it--the Supreme Court said this embodied discrimination (that is, the commission committed discrimination, not that the baker's freedom of religion would have been violated if he'd had to bake the cake, just that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission didn't give him a fair shot).  


So in theory, this isn't some major victory for anti-gay folks, just a reminder that states' processes need to respect people's freedom of religion.  In theory, this ruling leaves open the possibility that Colorado could still prohibit business owners from discriminating against gay people, but that they need to do via processes that don't violate anyone's First Amendment religious freedom along the way. 

But I still feel like (1) If they wanted to do that, they should have just remanded the case (meaning, sent it back down and told the state to redo the process in a fairer way rather than actually ruling on it; (2) Psychologically, sociologically, and culturally, this is a major defeat; (3) If they weren't okay with anti-gay discrimination, they would have ruled on the substantive issue; (4) Legally, this is going to set us back a bit and in the meantime, more gay people will be subjected to unfair treatment; (5) This feeds into the myth that religion and progressive politics are somehow inherently oppositional.

For more reading about the case, I recommend the New York Times and SCOTUS Blog.

Any other takes on this?
​

1 Comment
Wendell Ricketts
6/4/2018 06:46:58 pm

My read on this is that, as legal precedent, the ruling isn’t particularly meaningful or worrying. But your Nos. 2 and 3 above are potentially devastating.

There’s no question how the right will spin this (I’m not especially proud of the way the left is spinning it, but that’s another story), which means more procedurally “pure” cases may come among, though that implies that people must first experience discrimination in order for cases to exist — and all of us can wonder, not unreasonably, what business or accommodation or school or employer will decide the Bible has authorized him/her to turn us away. Sure, we can sue, and maybe we’d win, but there’s no cure in the law, as they say, for that kind of social, personal, psychological harm.

Similarly, I don’t think there’s much reason to be optimistic about what the majority on the court will do when anti-queer-discrimination cases come before them. It’s going to take a long time before that can be fixed.

I’m agnostic about the “message” — there are all kinds of messages all the time from all manner of sources, and I don’t think I know which ones people hear, internalize, and act upon, or which ones hurt them, or which hurtful messages actually serve to inspire and energize people vs. reduce them and make them fearful.

I am, however, eternally stuck on the million-dollar question. Why the fuck are we still not a protected class?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    TWITTER
    FACEBOOK
    INSTAGRAM
    EMAIL ME
    Picture


    ​Blogs I Like

    A Butch in the Kitchen
    A Stranger in This Place
    Bookish Butch
    Butch on Tap
    Card Carrying Lesbian
    ​
    Chapstick Femme

    Effing Dykes
    Feral Librarian
    Lawyers, Dykes, and Money

    Mainely Butch
    Neutrois Nonsense
    Pretty Butch
       

    Categories (NOT up to date...  working on it)

    All
    Accessories
    Adventures
    Advice
    Bisexuality
    Blogging
    Books
    Butch Identity
    Cars
    Clothes
    Coming Out
    Community
    Dating
    Family
    Fashion
    Female Masculinity
    Fiction
    Friends
    Gaydar
    Gender
    Girlfriends
    Guest Posts
    Hair
    Health
    Humor
    Husbands
    Identity
    Interviews
    Intro
    Lgbt Community
    Lgbt Law
    Lgbt Relationships
    Lists
    Marriage
    Media
    Politics
    Polls
    Pride
    Pride Project
    Readers
    Relationships
    Religion
    Reviews
    Search Terms
    Shopping
    Silliness
    Social Change
    Ties
    Trans
    Work


    Archives

    September 2022
    May 2019
    February 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011

    RSS Feed

 
  • Blog
  • Butch Store: Genderqueer Us
  • About
  • Contact